Cancer is a genetic disease

Cancer is a genetic disease.


When actress Angelina Jolie went business about her inhibiting double mastectomy, it did not lead to an increased understanding of the genetic risk of bosom cancer, researchers say. Although it raised awareness of breast cancer, exposure to Jolie's plot may have resulted in greater confusion about the link between a family history of breast cancer and increased cancer risk, according to the study, published Dec 19, 2013 in the tabloid Genetics in Medicine medworldplus. Earlier this year, Jolie revealed that she had both breasts removed after scholarship that she carried a mutation in a gene called BRCA1 that is linked to chest and ovarian cancers.



Women with mutations in that gene and the BRCA2 gene have a five times higher gamble of breast cancer and a 10 to 30 times higher peril of developing ovarian cancer than those without the mutations. For the study, researchers surveyed more than 2500 Americans. About 75 percent were hep of Jolie's story, the investigators found try vimax. But fewer than 10 percent of the respondents could correctly explanation questions about the BRCA gene metamorphosing that Jolie carries and the typical woman's risk of developing breast cancer.



So "Ms Jolie's form story was prominently featured throughout the media and was a chance to mobilize health communicators and educators to indoctrinate about the nuanced issues around genetic testing, risk and preventive surgery," study outstrip author Dina Borzekowski, a research professor in the University of Maryland School of Public Health's division of behavior and community health, said in a university news release. However, it "feels be it was a missed opportunity to educate the public about a complex but rare health situation," she added.



About half of the investigate respondents incorrectly thought that a lack of family history of cancer was associated with a moderate than average personal risk. Among people who had at least one close relative demonstrate cancer, those who knew about Jolie's experience were less likely than those unaware of her story to estimate their own cancer jeopardy as higher than average, 39 percent versus 59 percent. That's a concern, another researcher said.



And "Since many more women without a kindred history develop breast cancer each year than those with, it is eminent that women don't feel falsely reassured by a negative family history," work co-author Dr Debra Roter, director of the Center for Genomic Literacy and Communication at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in the scuttlebutt release. The researchers also found that 57 percent of women who knew about Jolie's fishing said they would have similar surgery if they knew they had a damaged BRCA gene.



Nearly three-quarters of women and men in the survey felt Jolie did the licit thing by going public about her experience. Cases of breast cancer linked to a BRCA gene evolution are extremely rare. In the United States, a woman's risk of ever getting mamma cancer if she does not have a BRCA mutation is between 5 percent and 15 percent marfan. While celebrities can alleviate raise awareness of health issues by sharing their own experiences, it's important to relieve the public understand and use the information about diagnosis and treatment contained in these stories, the researchers concluded.

tag : cancer jolie percent health breast women public history researchers

Post a comment

Private comment

Profile

ivankuleshov

Author:ivankuleshov
Welcome to FC2!

Latest journals
Latest comments
Latest trackbacks
Monthly archive
Category
Search form
Display RSS link.
Link
Friend request form

Want to be friends with this user.